MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

War and Peace

2025· book-chapter· en· W4416383776 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Dilley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthColonialismLiberian dollarWorld War IIPoliticsCurrencyMercantilism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Second World War disrupted business life more profoundly than the first. The FCCBE entered virtual abeyance. However, as the war ended chambers began again to coordinate. The FCCBE revived with a business conference in London in 1945 and the resumption of congresses in 1948. So too did the concept of the Empire-Commonwealth, which, as the chapter shows, carried on as chambers attempted to imagine a post-war economic future. Imperial preference, the sterling area, and myriad wartime regulations meant that Commonwealth level economic coordination remained tangible—economic governance persisted. This chapter traces this phase, emphasizing how the revival of the FCCBE was real but also uncovered fissures and especially a growing distance between Canada, whose dollar alignment created barriers to the sterling Commonwealth. The chapter focuses particularly on the last-ditch advocacy of imperial preference and reaction against the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). It then turns to currency and the travails of the sterling area. A penultimate section outlines the continued wider plethora of albeit fading areas on which in the 1950s economic coordination seemed possible. Finally, it outlines how, for the first time, a much stronger late colonial vision emerged for the dependent empire, segueing into anxiety over political decolonisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCommonwealth, Australian Politics and FederalismFrench-language works237,207