MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416384479 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08322

Boundary representations, geometry of matrix ranges, and C$^*$-envelopes of finite-dimensional operator systems

2025· preprint· en· W4416384479 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Douglas Farenick, Chi-Kwong Li, Sushil Singla

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOperator (biology)Boundary (topology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Compact operatorRegular polygonShift operatorLinear mapNumerical rangeOperator matrixDisplacement operator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A ‐tuple of bounded linear selfadjoint operators acting on an infinite‐dimensional separable Hilbert space is said to have the Smith–Ward property if the identity map of the image of the operator system in the Calkin algebra has a completely positive lift. In this paper, we focus on noncommutative geometric properties of a finite‐dimensional operator system with the goal of understanding how geometric information encoded by the essential matrix range of a spanning set of a linear basis for the operator system implies the Smith–Ward property. Some geometric objects of special interest in this paper include one form of a noncommutative complex Euclidean ball and maximal noncommutative cubes and polydiscs, as well as some extremal compact matrix convex sets, or , determined by a given compact convex subset of .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207