10,239 whole genomes with multiomic and clinical health information as the Korean Multiomics Reference dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present Korea10K, the largest genomic dataset of the Korean population, comprising 10,239 high-coverage whole genomes (mean depth 30×) with matched multiomic profiles and phenotype data. Korea10K achieves complete and near-complete discovery of very rare and ultra-rare alleles, respectively, at 9,000 Korean genomes. This dataset provides the high-quality population-specific imputation panel, enabling accurate inference of low-frequency variants. Admixture analyses confirm the genetic homogeneity of the Korean population, despite its diverse Y-chromosomal, mitochondrial, and HLA repertoires. This pattern reflects a long and continuous lineage history characterized by persistent internal admixture and genomic homogenization over thousands of years on the Korean peninsula. We also identified 16.8 million genomic variants that directly modify CG sites by creating or abolishing CG dinucleotides, providing the population-scale evidence of coordinated genomic-epigenomic regulatory mechanism in Koreans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".