MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416386195 · doi:10.1145/3777481

DPANet: Domain Pyramid Attention Network for Domain Generalization on Medical Image Segmentation in Connected Health

2025· article· en· W4416386195 on OpenAlexaff
Songhe Yuan, Laurence T. Yang, Debin Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationPyramid (geometry)Image segmentationDomain (mathematical analysis)Similarity (geometry)GeneralizationDomain knowledgeKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connected health integrates sensors, mobile devices, and information technology to realize the real-time collection and transmission of medical data, providing patients with more personalized and efficient medical services. In this context, medical image segmentation technology plays a vital role as a key digital medicine tool in connected health. However, its effective deployment across diverse clinical settings and data sources remains challenging due to inherent variations in imaging modalities, patient demographics, and device characteristics. Currently, connected health requires highly efficient AI models for real-world medical applications. The versatility of the model across diverse environments is of great significance. Domain Generalization (DG) has emerged as a crucial solution to address these challenges of connected health. Previous work focuses on the domain similarity calculation on the final layer output of the backbone model, which ignores the impact of the multi-scale features. In this paper, we proposed a Domain Pyramid Attention Network (DPANet), which aims to transfer knowledge from source domains to unseen domains for medical image segmentation at a multi-scale level. The overarching goal is to enhance the efficiency of connected health systems through this innovative knowledge transfer mechanism. DPANet is capable of learning multi-scale similarity between two kinds of domains through a Domain Similarity Pyramid Attention Module (DSPAM). We also designed Domain Prototypes (DP), which can enhance the flexibility of the knowledge pre-extracted from source domains for better transferability. A simple fusion method is adopted to merge the multi-scale features for the final segmentation prediction. DPANet is evaluated on Brain Tumor segmentation and Retina Fundus segmentation tasks, achieving an average Dice improvement of 1.14% and 0.98% on these two tasks, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Computing for HealthcareSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207