MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416389709 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.14.688340

Quantitative profiling of whole-brain connectomes at single-axon resolution using deep learning and high-resolution light sheet microscopy

2025· preprint· en· W4416389709 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmadreza Attarpour, Misha Raffiee, Tony Xu, Jonas Osmann, Shruti Patel, Fengqing Yu, Braedyn Au, Andrew Clappison, Mahdi Biparva, Rui Zhu, Ailey Crow, Barsin Eshaghi Gharagoz, Matthew Rozak, Isabelle Aubert, JoAnne McLaurin, Karl Deisseroth, Bojana Stefanovic, Maged Goubran

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaUniversity of TorontoCanada Research ChairsAlzheimer's Society
KeywordsDeep learningConnectomeProfiling (computer programming)Pipeline (software)ConnectomicsHuman Connectome ProjectLight sheet fluorescence microscopyHigh resolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Revealing how individual axons create a brain-wide connectome would be indispensable for understanding brain function and behavior, yet remains technically challenging. We introduce MAPL3, an end-to-end pipeline that integrates self-supervised learning with an innovative deep architecture to capture local and global brain-wide axonal projections. MAPL3 enables subject- and population-level quantitative laminar analysis, generalizes across experiments, and outperforms state-of-the-art methods. We showcase its ability to map the circuitry of the orbitofrontal cortex from single axons to whole-brain projectome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCell Image Analysis Techniques→French-language works237,207→