MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416390227 · doi:10.31192/np.23.3.8

The Rise of Loneliness Among Young People

2025· article· hr· W4416390227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roman Globokar, David Kraner, Marko Weilguny

Bibliographic record

VenueNova prisutnost · 2025
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessFeelingPerceptionDisconnectionSocial mediaDisplacement (psychology)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article explores the increasing prevalence of loneliness among young people, focusing on digital media’s role in shaping their social experiences. Drawing from historical, psychological, and sociological perspectives, the authors argue that loneliness is not merely physical isolation, but a deeply subjective feeling tied to perceived disconnection from meaningful relationships. Two key hypotheses frame the analysis: the displacement hypothesis (digital media replaces face-to-face interaction and increases loneliness) and the stimulation hypothesis (digital media enhances existing relationships and reduces loneliness). The impact of digital media depends largely on its usage—active versus passive engagement—and the user’s underlying social needs. The article presents findings from a 2022 survey of 654 Slovenian secondary school students. A quarter of respondents reported frequent or constant feelings of loneliness. Students who reported greater loneliness also had more difficulty socializing and were less willing to give up social media use, suggesting a possible dependence on digital interaction as a substitute for real-life connection. The authors emphasize the importance of subjective perceptions of loneliness, arguing that standardized scales often fail to capture this. They advocate for more attention in educational settings to support students experiencing deep loneliness – especially those who may not reach out or appear isolated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova prisutnostSame topicImpact of Technology on AdolescentsFrench-language works237,207