Efficacy of Local Radical Excision combined with ALA-photodynamic therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess the efficacy of local radical excision combined with ALA-photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Retrospective analysis of 11 moderate-to-severe HS patients treated with Local radical excision combined with ALA-photodynamic therapy. All patients achieved clinical response. Two had focal recurrences at 6 and 9 months (no recurrence after reintervention for 15 months); four had minor recurrences (6–17 months, controlled topically); five remained recurrence-free (6–24 months). DLQI improved from 21.18±3.68 to 6.18±3.89. Vancouver Scar Scale scores (2–8) were acceptable with no functional impairment. Local radical excision combined with ALA-photodynamic therapy is a safe and effective treatment for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa.This approach accelerates wound healing, reduces recurrence, and minimizes scarring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".