MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416391931 · doi:10.1142/s1793524525501499

Optimal control and dynamics of human papillomavirus model with sexual and nonsexual transmission

2025· article· en· W4416391931 on OpenAlexaff
Juping Zhang, Huifen Guo, Jing An, Wenhui Hao, Huaiping Zhu, Zhen Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biomathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Optimal controlHuman papillomavirusPopulationControl (management)Sexual contactSensitivity (control systems)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic model of human papillomavirus (HPV) with both sexual and nonsexual transmission is established, the expressions for HPV transmission routes of heterosexual females, heterosexual males and men who have sex with men (MSM) in the model are given, the transmission threshold of the model is derived, the dynamic behavior is analyzed in heterosexual population and MSM. Parameters estimation and numerical simulations are carried out by actual data, which are from Xingning City, Guangdong Province, China, and the sensitivity analysis of threshold. The results show that nonsexual contact has a significant impact on the spread of HPV. Finally, the optimal control of the model is studied. The results show that among the different control costs, the lower the control cost of the individual burden, the more the number of infected individuals that can be afforded, which leads to the lower the number of the overall people infected. Therefore, in the long run, low-cost control is the optimal control. It is also found that for the prevention of HPV, it is not only necessary to actively vaccinate, reduce the number of sexual partners, but also pay attention to nonsexual transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiomathematicsSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207