Penerapan Metode Project Based Learning (PJBL) pada IPAS Tentang Perkembangbiakan Tumbuhan untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV di SDI Harekakae
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to improve the learning outcomes of fourth-grade students at SDI Harekakae in Science subject about plant reproduction through the implementation of Project Based Learning (PjBL) method. The research method used is classroom action research (CAR) which was carried out in two cycles. Each cycle consists of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The subjects of the research were fourth-grade students of SDI Harekakae in the academic year of [Academic Year], totaling [Number of Students] students. Data on student learning outcomes were obtained through formative tests at the end of each cycle. The results showed that the implementation of the PjBL method can improve student learning outcomes in plant reproduction material. The improvement of learning outcomes can be seen from the increase in the average class score from cycle I to cycle II. Thus, the PjBL method can be used as an effective learning alternative to improve student learning outcomes in Science subject.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it