“Fathers Are Not Mothers” Nurses’ Experiences of Practicing With Fathers When Providing Care to Their Children: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This qualitative review aims to synthesize the evidence on nurses' experience of intervening with fathers when providing care to their young children. Five databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were (a) nurses' experience, (b) intervention with fathers, (c) written in English or French. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Qualitative thematic synthesis of 17 peer-reviewed studies was performed by 12 family nurse researchers from six countries. Three analytical themes were identified: "Conceiving of the father's role in terms of his involvement within the family"; "Working with fathers based on the nurse's individual conception of the paternal role"; and "Developing a sense of efficacy in working with fathers." The results highlight the importance of raising family nurses' awareness of fathers' individual realities. Training in this regard makes it possible to modify nurses' perceptions of the paternal role and to promote the adoption of father inclusive practices within the family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".