MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416397012 · doi:10.1484/m.em-eb.5.153240

Lost, Then Found in Canada: Stories Behind Some Medieval Manuscript Fragments that Have Journeyed Across the Ocean

2025· book-chapter· en· W4416397012 on OpenAlexaffabout
Debra Lacoste

Bibliographic record

VenueEpitome musical · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeAgency (philosophy)Period (music)Context (archaeology)Action (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although hundreds of dispersed leaves from dismantled medieval manuscripts have been located outside of Europe, there are likely many hundreds or thousands more that remain known only to their owners.While working on Cantus: A Database for Latin Ecclesiastical Chant, 1 I began to suspect that in Canadian institutional collections and private ownership there were more items lost than found.Following a number of email inquiries from members of the general public who were hoping we could tell them something about their medieval music fragments, as well as anecdotal accounts from colleagues who could tell stories about spotting parchment leaves in the back rooms of libraries, my curiosity was piqued as to the number of both catalogued and uncatalogued medieval chant manuscript fragments that might be part of public, institutional, and private collections in Canada.What do these leaves contain?Why were they dismantled from their books?How did they make it to Canada?And, who knows that they are here?There are many reasons for the existence of fragments of medieval chant books.Not only was it a long time ago when these books were originally used, but liturgical reforms, the adoption of polyphony which replaced at least some of the chant, changes in the style and technology of musical notation such as the introduction of staff lines, and the advent of printed books led to both adjustments in the contents and discontinued use of chant manuscripts throughout the later Middle Ages and the early modern period.Recycling of the parchment from older books was a licit activity and it produced necessary materials for new book bindings, such as pastedowns, flyleaves, and spine linings, both visible and hidden.It is, however, the seemingly-illicit book-breaking that has occurred in recent centuries that has provided the most numerous and most intact remnants from medieval chant books.These pieces have often been preserved because of their illuminated initials or the inherent decorative quality of their neumatic notations.Much could be written about modern attitudes toward medieval objects now considered art despite their original functional nature; even so, these items have value to their contemporary owners, whether monetary as highly-sought auctionable pieces or sentimental as treasured historical artefacts from centuries ago.Loose medieval manuscript leaves have been travelling around the world for years, passing among collectors, institutions and private citizens through auctions, as gifts or inheritances, and sold in antiquarian bookshops.They now reside in archival cases, in library filing cabinets,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpitome musicalSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207