Hesiodic Reception in Pseudo-Oppian’s Account of the Onagros ( Cynegetica 3.183–250)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This article explores a hitherto unnoticed allusion to Hesiod’s Theogony in the presentation of the onagros in pseudo-Oppian’s Cynegetica . After a discussion of the elements that substantiate the case for pseudo-Oppian’s conscious engagement with Hesiod, I contextualise the onagros episode by comparison with additional passages in the Cynegetica , Oppian’s Halieutica , as well as other famous literary texts. Abstract: Cet article explore une allusion à la Théogonie d’Hésiode passée jusqu’à présent inaperçue dans la présentation de l’ onagros dans les Cynégétiques de pseudo-Oppien. Après avoir discuté des éléments qui soutiennent l’hypothèse d’un intertexte volontaire de la part d’Oppien avec Hésiode, je replace l’épisode de l’ onagros dans son contexte en le comparant à d’autres passages des Cynégétiques , des Halieutiques d’Oppien, et d’autres œuvres littéraires célèbres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".