MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416401521 · doi:10.1353/phx.2025.a975530

Janiculum et Saturnia : Retour sur une controverse Virgilienne

2025· article· en· W4416401521 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François Ripoll

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)Character (mathematics)Middle AgesPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This article reevaluates the hypothesis proposed by P. Grimal in 1945 that the Janiculum mentioned by Evander during his walk with Aeneas on the site of Rome (Aen. 8.356–58) is an ancient name for the northern top of the Capitoline, rather than the hill known under that name in classical times. A close reading of the passage shows that this hypothesis is the only one compatible with the internal logic of the text. Abstract: Cet article vise à réévaluer l’hypothèse proposée par P. Grimal en 1945 selon laquelle le Janiculum mentionné par Évandre lors de sa promenade avec Énée sur l’endroit où sera fondée Rome (En., VIII, 356–58) serait un ancien nom du sommet nord du Capitole, et non la colline connue sous ce nom à l’époque classique. Une lecture attentive du passage montre que cette hypothèse est la seule compatible avec la logique interne du texte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207