MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416401610 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2025.a975319

Images of Welsh Seaside Tourism in Punch, or the London Charivari , 1841–1900

2025· article· en· W4416401610 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sofie Vandepitte

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelshDecadenceTourismEliteDestinations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: From the mid-nineteenth century, British seaside tourism became increasingly popular among the elite as well as the lower classes. Older resorts such as Brighton bloomed, and new resorts such as Llandudno were built, often in previously inaccessible and far-flung areas such as Wales. Seaside tourism, and leisure in general, was not perceived as a fully innocent pastime, however, and magazines such as Punch arduously played into the controversy. Although most of its attention was directed towards England, Punch also satirized the growing Welsh seaside tourist industry. This article explores how Punch represented Welsh resorts in two diagonally opposed ways: as loci of both decadence and primitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207