Systematic analysis of immune cell motility leveraging the open intravital microscopy database Immunemap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of immune cells in living organisms is a major goal in bioimaging. Intravital microscopy enables direct observation of cellular behavior over time with tissue-to-subcellular resolution, making it essential for investigating immune responses across tissues, conditions, and disease contexts. However, most intravital microscopy data remain siloed in individual labs, limiting reuse, standardization, and large-scale analysis. To address these limitations, we present Immunemap, an open-data platform and interactive atlas of immune cell motility. Immunemap currently provides access to over 58,000 curated single-cell tracks and more than 1,049,000 cell-centroid annotations from 400 intravital microscopy videos in murine models, spanning diverse tissues and conditions. The platform supports both exploratory and quantitative research. We show here how unsupervised learning identifies distinct motility patterns, and how large-scale mapping enables comparisons across stimuli, imaging setups, and organs. Its cloud-based architecture offers an interactive web interface and public APIs for integration with computational pipelines. By adhering to FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse) and fostering cross-disciplinary studies, Immunemap supports reproducible research and provides a benchmark for bioimage analysis and tool development in intravital imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".