MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AVQS: Advanced Video Querying System for Machine Learning Applications

2025· article· W4416402710 on OpenAlexaff
Vikas Kumar, Brendan Gignac, Abdulrauf Gidado

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlgoma UniversityUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataMinimum bounding boxObject (grammar)Video trackingObject detectionVolume (thermodynamics)Bounding overwatchRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing volume of video data, exemplified by datasets such as YouTube-8M, presents significant challenges to data engineering processes, particularly in efficiently extracting relevant information for model training. Existing video querying systems often fall short in providing a comprehensive solution, lacking the ability to fetch relevant video sections and frames, analyze videos for effective searching, and store data in a centralized location. These limitations are particularly problematic for enterprises with large datasets, often composed of multiple sources, where new projects frequently emerge. Such projects require specific types of videos, such as those featuring cars or animals. Currently, meeting these changing needs requires reprocessing existing datasets or relying on previously assigned tags, which may not capture the full range of complex interactions. In response to these challenges, we propose a video querying system that enables precise searches within large-scale video datasets. Our solution employs Yolo11 for object detection and tracking, generating detailed metadata that includes bounding box coordinates and timestamps. This metadata is stored in a MongoDB database, allowing users to perform complex queries, such as identifying when a person and a car are within 10 pixels of each other. By optimizing the retrieval of relevant video segments and enhancing the tagging process, our system aims to meet the evolving needs of enterprises while leveraging the current technological capabilities of the Yolo11 model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207