MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416402911 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1659425

Plasma lipidomic signatures reveal age-associated patterns of septic shock risk and immune dysregulation in sepsis

2025· article· en· W4416402911 on OpenAlexaff
Yuhan Sun, Ke Lin, Ling Wang, Jingwen Ai, Jingjing Zhao, Ruiwen Sun, Xiaoyang Cheng, Yanmin Wan, Peng Cui, Sen Wang, Jing Wu, Jialin Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersShanghai Hospital Development CenterNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaShanghai Municipal Health Commission
KeywordsImmune dysregulationSepsisSeptic shockImmune systemLipidomicsDiseaseRisk stratification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sepsis is associated with significant lipidomic disturbances, but age-associated lipidomic patterns remain poorly characterized. Given the links between aging, immune dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation, defining age-specific lipid profiles could improve sepsis risk assessment. This study investigates age-stratified lipidomic signatures in sepsis and identifies biomarkers for clinical severity. ​Methods: We prospectively enrolled 62 sepsis patients (21 <65 years, 41 ≥65 years) and 40 healthy controls. Plasma lipidomics was performed via untargeted LC-MS/MS, identifying 1,277 lipid species across 38 subclasses. Principal component analysis (PCA) and consensus clustering were used to assess lipidomic differences and define patient subtypes. Correlations between lipid subclasses, clinical severity (SOFA scores), and immune cell subsets were analyzed. An age-adjusted risk stratification model was developed to assess septic shock and mortality risk (AUC analysis). ​Results: Sepsis patients exhibited reduced phosphatidylcholine (PC), cholesteryl ester (CE), and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) levels (all P<0.05). Clustering revealed four lipidomic patterns, with Cluster 4 distinguishing two sepsis subtypes (C1, C2). Subtype C2 had higher septic shock incidence (57.1% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.0013) and downregulation of 92 lipids, 35 of which strongly correlated with SOFA scores. A risk stratification model incorporating six key lipids (LPC(19:0), PC(P-19:0), SM 32:3;2O(FA 16:3), PC(P-20:0), PC(O-18:1/20:3), CE(15:0)) and age accurately predicted septic shock (AUC: 0.87 training, 0.82 validation) and mortality risk in elderly patients. PC levels correlated with monocytes, while CE and LPC associated with complement proteins and CD8+ T cells. ​Conclusions: Our lipid-based model effectively predicts septic shock and mortality, particularly in elderly sepsis patients. Age-associated lipid alterations (PC, LPC, CE reduction) correlate with disease severity and immune dysregulation, suggesting distinct lipid-immune mechanisms in younger vs. elderly patients. These findings support lipidomics as a tool for sepsis risk stratification and personalized therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Immunology→Same topicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→