MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416410963 · doi:10.1016/j.bas.2025.105879

Genetic signatures of responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure Hydrocephalus: Insights from whole-exome and LASSO-based analysis

2025· article· en· W4416410963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Spine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České RepublikyMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
KeywordsGeneGenomeDiseaseGenome-wide association studyImmune systemGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a potentially reversible neurological disorder characterised by the triad of gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence, together with ventriculomegaly despite normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure (1-3). Although traditionally considered non-genetic and multifactorial, emerging data suggest that rare pathogenic variants and cilia-related mechanisms may contribute to its pathogenesis and modulate responsiveness to CSF diversion (8-12). Methods: We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) in 33 consecutive patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed iNPH who underwent a standardised 120-h lumbar drainage (LD) protocol. Responders were defined as those showing ≥20 % improvement in gait speed or ≥3-point increase in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score compared with baseline. Variants were filtered according to ACMG/AMP guidelines (19) and population allele frequency (minor allele frequency <1 %). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression (20) with ten-fold cross-validation was applied to identify gene-level predictors of LD responsiveness. Results: After filtering, 110 genes with at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant were retained for modelling. LASSO regression at the λ.1se threshold identified a five-gene panel-FANCD2, ATR, ORAI1, MUC1, and RP1L1-involved in DNA damage response, calcium signalling, epithelial barrier integrity, and ciliary architecture (21-28). The internally derived model achieved an accuracy of 81.8 %, sensitivity 68.8 %, specificity 94.1 %, and positive predictive value 91.7 % for prediction of LD response. Conclusions: Rare pathogenic variants in genes linked to genome stability, immune and calcium signalling, and ciliary structure may influence LD responsiveness in iNPH. The five-gene model represents a biologically plausible, hypothesis-generating tool for preoperative risk stratification. Validation in larger, multicentre cohorts, integration with shunt outcomes, and functional studies are required before any clinical implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it