MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416413223 · doi:10.3390/rs17223773

Evolution of Spaceborne SAR Missions in Earth Orbit

2025· article· en· W4416413223 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marco D’Errico

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth observationSatelliteEarth observation satelliteLow earth orbitSynthetic aperture radarSpace-based radarOrbit (dynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A truly operational SAR was first flown in space in 1978 on board the Seasat satellite. Since then, its utilization first expanded to Canada, Europe and Japan, and then to countries with emerging space industries later on. Many technological developments have been crucial in the evolution of SAR missions. The introduction of active phased array antennas enabled a variety of operation modes and expanded SAR data applications. Miniaturization of satellite technology allowed for a paradigm change in SAR mission development with the use of small and micro satellites in lieu of large spacecraft. The paper reviews 47 years of SAR missions in low Earth orbit and highlights evolution trends by analyzing 200 satellites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207