The Contribution of the Social Activists to the Popularization of the Northern Sea Route as a Factor in the Development of the Northern Territories of the Yenisei Province (Late XIX – Early XX Centuries)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last quarter of the 19th and early 20th centuries, the process of capitalist modernization was actively un-derway in the territory of the Yenisei province. Transport communications were an important factor in the devel-opment of trade relations. This article examines the efforts of the entrepreneurial elite of Yeniseisk to promote the use of the Northern Sea Route to expand opportunities for international trade through shipping on the Ye-nisei River and to develop production in the Yenisei District and Turukhansk Region. Based on archival and published sources, the motives and methods of activity of the Yenisei merchants in attracting public attention to the problems of intensifying commerce in the northern regions of the Yenisei province are analyzed. The au-thor comes to the conclusion that despite the high interest and demonstration of an active position in the use of the Northern Sea Route, entrepreneurs and social activists failed to revive the northern trade. Yeniseisk gradu-ally lost its importance as a trade and transport hub for the development of commerce and production in the Yenisei province and Siberia as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".