Machine Learning-Identified Potent Antimicrobial Peptides Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Skin Infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The escalating global crisis of antibiotic resistance necessitates the discovery of novel antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a promising alternative to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Because traditional AMP discovery is labour-intensive and costly, machine learning (ML) is applied to identify AMPs effective against MDR bacteria and skin infections. Methods: The ML-based CalcAMP model predicts the antimicrobial activity of 16,384 unique 14-amino-acid peptide sequences, resulting in a novel Guided Designed Smart antimicrobial Therapeutic (GDST) peptide catalogue. Parent sequences and retro-inverso (RI) variants of two prime GDST peptides undergo extensive testing against MDR bacteria and in skin infection models. Results: GDST-038 and GDST-045, along with their RI variants, show potent antimicrobial activity against Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus, rapidly depolarizing the cytoplasmic membrane, exhibiting broad-spectrum bactericidal effects against ESKAPE pathogens, and causing minimal haemolysis. RI variants display superior A. baumannii biofilm killing compared to parent sequences, while all GDST peptides achieve >3-log reductions in S. aureus biofilm CFU within 24 h. Potent efficacy is observed in a 3D human skin epidermal infection model, with elimination of S. aureus at ≥15 μM. No resistance develops after 22 passages. Conclusions: ML-driven screening enables rapid identification of two novel candidate AMPs, highlighting the therapeutic potential of GDST peptides for MDR bacterial infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".