MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416420312 · doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2025.125745

Structure maps and crystal growth of ternary ThCr2Si2-type rare-earth transition-metal silicides and germanides

2025· article· en· W4416420312 on OpenAlexafffund
Ritobroto Sikdar, Dundappa Mumbaraddi, Pradip Das, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid State Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsTernary operationIndiumValence (chemistry)Crystal structureAtomic radiusValence electronTransition metalLattice (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To classify ternary rare-earth silicides REM 2 Si 2 and germanides REM 2 Ge 2 adopting the ThCr 2 Si 2 -type structure, a two-dimensional map based on radius ratios and valence electron counts was developed. This map suggested that the transition metal M plays a dominant role, which was confirmed independently by applying a machine learning algorithm called the sure independence screening and sparsifying operator (SISSO) method. In this way, a simple one-dimensional descriptor based solely on properties of the metal component M was identified in which ThCr 2 Si 2 -type phases are more likely to be formed if this descriptor meets a minimum threshold of 1.68 for silicides and 2.27 for germanides. Although arc-melting is typically used to prepare these compounds, it does not usually afford suitably sized crystals for further characterization. Flux growth of ternary germanides was investigated, with the use of indium yielding crystals of RE Co 2 Ge 2 ( RE = Ce, Eu, Yb) and other compounds. Two-dimensional maps were developed to classify ternary rare-earth silicides and germanides with ThCr2Si2-type structure, but simpler one-dimensional maps were also sought by machine learning. • Models were sought to classify ThCr 2 Si 2 -type silicides and germanides. • Radius ratios and valence electron counts are effective descriptors. • A simpler one-dimensional descriptor was developed by machine learning. • Single crystals of ternary germanides were grown in indium flux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid State ChemistrySame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207