A Multi-Sensor Machine Learning Framework for Field-Scale Soil Salinity Mapping Under Data-Scarce Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil salinity severely constrains agricultural productivity and soil health, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Conventional salinity assessment methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and spatially limited. This study developed a data-scarce workflow integrating proximal sensing (EM38-MK2), very high-resolution multispectral imagery, and machine learning to map soil salinity at field scale in the semi-arid Sehb El Masjoune area, central Morocco. A total of 26 soil samples were analyzed for Electrical Conductivity (EC), and 500 Apparent Electrical Conductivity (ECa) measurements were collected and calibrated using the field samples. Spectral and topographic covariates derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and PlanetScope imagery supported model training using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and a Stacked Ensemble Learning Model (ELM). Regression Kriging (RK) was applied to model residuals to improve spatial prediction. ELM achieved the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.87, RMSE ≈ 4.15), followed by RF, which effectively captured nonlinear spatial patterns. RK improved PLSR accuracy (by 11.1% for PlanetScope, 13.8% for UAV) but offered limited gains for RF, SVR, and ELM. SHAP analysis identified topographic covariates as the most influential predictors. Both UAV and PlanetScope delineated similar saline–sodic zones. The study demonstrates the following: (1) a scalable, data-efficient workflow for salinity mapping; (2) model and RK performance depend more on algorithmic design than sensor type; (3) interpretable ML and spatial modeling enhance understanding of salinity processes in semi-arid systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".