Overview of Monitoring, Diagnostics, Aging Analysis, and Maintenance Strategies in High-Voltage AC/DC XLPE Cable Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-voltage (HV) cable systems-particularly those insulated with cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE)-are increasingly deployed in both AC and DC applications due to their excellent electrical and mechanical performance. However, their long-term reliability is challenged by partial discharges (PD), insulation aging, space charge accumulation, and thermal and electrical stresses. This review provides a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art technologies and methodologies across several domains critical to the assessment and enhancement of cable reliability. It covers advanced condition monitoring (CM) techniques, including sensor-based PD detection, signal acquisition, and denoising methods. Aging mechanisms under various stressors and lifetime estimation approaches are analyzed, along with fault detection and localization strategies using time-domain, frequency-domain, and hybrid methods. Physics-based and data-driven models for PD behavior and space charge dynamics are discussed, particularly under DC conditions. The article also reviews the application of numerical tools such as FEM for thermal and field stress analysis. A dedicated focus is given to machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for fault classification and predictive maintenance. Furthermore, standards, testing protocols, and practical issues in sensor deployment and calibration are summarized. The review concludes by evaluating intelligent maintenance approaches-including condition-based and predictive strategies-framed within real-world asset management contexts. The paper aims to bridge theoretical developments with field-level implementation challenges, offering a roadmap for future research and practical deployment in resilient and smart power grids. This review highlights a clear gap in fully integrated AC/DC diagnostic and aging analyses for XLPE cables. We emphasize the need for unified physics-based and ML-driven frameworks to address HVDC space-charge effects and multi-stress degradation. These insights provide concise guidance for advancing reliable and scalable cable assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".