Phthalates, bisphenols, and childhood allergic Phenotypes: Findings from two birth cohort studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phthalates and bisphenols may contribute to childhood allergic outcomes, but whether these are differentially associated with atopic or non-atopic phenotypes is uncertain. We investigated whether early-life exposure to these chemicals differentially impacts atopic and non-atopic allergic outcomes. We used two birth cohorts to investigate late pregnancy and early childhood exposure windows. The Barwon Infant Study (n = 797) in Australia measured urinary phthalate and bisphenol metabolites at 36 weeks' gestation. The Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development Study (n = 993) measured phthalate metabolites at 3, 12, and 36 months. Atopy was assessed using skin prick tests at 4-5 years. Outcomes included asthma, wheeze, eczema, and rhinitis at 4-5 years. Models were stratified by atopy. We modelled exposure mixtures using quantile G-computation and Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression. Prenatal mono-carboxy-propyl phthalate was suggestively associated with non-atopic asthma (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.12; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.27) with evidence of effect modification by atopy (p for interaction = 0.02). Prenatal bisphenol A was inversely associated with overall wheeze (aRR = 0.64; 95 % CI: 0.44-0.94). In the postnatal period, diethyl and dibutyl phthalates were associated with non-atopic asthma, but not with atopic asthma, though estimates did not differ substantially by atopic status. Prenatal phthalate mixtures were more strongly associated with non-atopic asthma (aRR = 1.83; 95 % CI: 1.10-3.04), with evidence of effect modification by atopy (p = 0.02 for interaction). Postnatal phthalate mixtures were associated with non-atopic asthma (aRR = 1.82, 95 % CI: 1.19-2.78), but not atopic asthma, though the association did not differ by phenotype (p for interaction = 0.45). Phthalate mixtures showed U-shaped (prenatal) and inverse U-shaped (postnatal) associations with atopic asthma, and linear positive associations with non-atopic asthma. There was little evidence of associations for other allergic outcomes. Early-life exposure to phthalates may differentially influence the risk of childhood atopic and non-atopic asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".