MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416426723 · doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101550

Groundwater level forecasting in response to climate change scenarios in southwestern Saskatchewan using wavelet decomposition and artificial neural networks

2025· article· en· W4416426723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGroundwater for Sustainable Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGlobal Water FuturesCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsGroundwaterClimate changeArtificial neural networkDecompositionHydrology (agriculture)Wavelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global warming has intensified extreme climate events, including prolonged droughts, altering precipitation patterns and threatening groundwater resources. Additional stresses from economic development, population growth, and land use changes exacerbate groundwater depletion, often exceeding recharge rates. This study develops a hybrid artificial neural networks (ANN) and wavelet decomposition (WA) model to forecast long-term groundwater levels (GWLs) until 2100 under future climate scenarios in southwestern Saskatchewan to inform sustainable groundwater management strategies in a data-scarce region with a complex disconnected aquifer system. Monthly gridded precipitation and temperature data were combined with monthly GWLs from three wells in two aquifers. Three machine learning ANN models were applied and evaluated to forecast GWLs: i) nonlinear autoregressive network with exogenous input (NARX), ii) nonlinear autoregressive network (NAR), and iii) nonlinear input-output network (NIO). WA was integrated with NIO and NAR for signal denoising. Moreover, two base models were applied to each well: i) linear regression (LR), and ii) autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) to quantify WA-ANN added value. Three learning algorithms, Levenberg-Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularization (BR), and scaled conjugate gradient (SCG), trained the models with varying neurons and delay times. Results show that NARX trained with BR produce the most accurate predictions for all wells. The applicability of WA-NIO and WA-NAR trained with LM in data-sparse settings remains largely exploratory with potential for improvement. GWLs are least impacted under SSP1-2.6, moderately affected under SSP2-4.5, and severely impacted under SSP5-8.5. These findings support decision-making through informing aquifer sustainability management plans under changing climate conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it