MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416427017 · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2025.100771

Sensitive periods for the link between childhood maltreatment and brain aging during adulthood

2025· article· en· W4416427017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurobiology of Stress · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Mental HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBrain and Behavior Research Foundation
KeywordsBrain agingLink (geometry)Association (psychology)Brain developmentLate childhoodPoison controlBrain damage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Childhood maltreatment (CM) is associated with the early onset of psychopathology and accelerated biological aging. However, outcomes vary widely among individuals with CM history. This variability may, in part, be explained by differences in age of exposure to CM. In this study, we examined whether CM was associated with accelerated brain aging, depending on the timing of exposure (i.e., 'sensitive periods'). Method: A machine learning algorithm of brain age trained prior to the current study in 3377 healthy individuals was employed in a CM dataset of 150 adult postnatal women, 92 of whom provided MRI data. CM history was retrospectively assessed from birth to age 18 years. Brain-predicted age was calculated from T1-weighted MRI scans. Brain age gap (BAG) was quantified as the disparity between brain-predicted age, relative to chronological age. Sensitive periods were identified using random forest regression with conditional inference trees. Results: CM severity was associated with greater BAG (β = 0.34, p < 0.001). The most robust type/time risk factors for greater BAG were parental verbal abuse between ages 7 and 15 years, parental physical abuse between ages 4 and 6 years, witnessing sibling violence between ages 4 and 15 years, and sexual abuse between ages 4-6. Parental verbal abuse (7-15 years) and parental physical abuse (4-6) were the variables that were the most important predictors above and beyond duration, multiplicity (number of exposures), and cumulative maltreatment severity. Conclusion: These findings suggest a link between CM and accelerated brain aging, with certain developmental periods appearing more sensitive to these effects. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to identify sensitive periods for the link between CM and brain aging in adults, and the first to examine the link between CM and brain aging in postnatal women. Together, these results suggest that CM's association with brain development is complex and warrants nuanced approaches to investigating the possible mechanisms underlying its effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it