MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416429198 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3635517

Algebraic Tracking Network Topology Processor for Modern Power Systems

2025· article· en· W4416429198 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Da S. P. Rondon, Vitor H. P. de Melo, Arthur Mouco, J. London

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsIndependent Electricity System Operator
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyPhasorPhasor measurement unitLogical topologyElectric power systemObservabilityUnits of measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing deployment of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) in Electric Power Systems (EPSs), status measurements from switchable devices are transmitted at high sampling rates, enabling rapid detection of switching events and continuous topology updates. Fast topology processing is therefore essential for reliable operation and decision-making in modern, dynamic EPSs. In this context, this paper proposes an Algebraic Tracking Network Topology Processor (AT-NTP), developed from algebraic formulations and a new islanding identification method. Using status measurements from PMUs and other sources, the AT-NTP determines and updates network topology through matrix factorization and refactorization, avoiding graph search algorithms and artificial intelligence techniques commonly used in existing topology processors. The AT-NTP is simple to implement, avoids combinatorial explosion, and does not require training stages. It efficiently detects switching events, island formation, bus merging or splitting, and measurement configuration changes without recomputing the topology from scratch. Its formulation applies to arbitrary substation configurations without requiring adaptations, making it flexible and suitable for various systems. Simulation results on benchmark and large-scale real networks demonstrate the AT-NTP’s computational efficiency and confirm its suitability for PMU-based state estimation and advanced energy management applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207