Building an Open CGRA Ecosystem for Agile Innovation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern computing workloads, particularly in AI and edge applications, demand hardware-software co-design to meet aggressive performance and energy targets. Such co-design benefits from open and agile platforms that replace closed, vertically integrated development with modular, community-driven ecosystems. Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Architectures (CGRAs), with their unique balance of flexibility and efficiency, are particularly well-suited for this paradigm. When built on open-source hardware generators and software toolchains, CGRAs provide a compelling foundation for architectural exploration, cross-layer optimization, and real-world deployment.In this paper, we will present an open CGRA ecosystem that we have developed to support agile innovation across the stack. Our contributions include HyCUBE, a CGRA with a reconfigurable single-cycle multi-hop interconnect for efficient data movement; PACE, which embeds a power-efficient HyCUBE within a RISC-V SoC targeting edge computing; and Morpher, a fully open-source, architecture-adaptive CGRA design framework that supports design space exploration, compilation, simulation, and validation. By embracing openness at every layer, we aim to lower barriers to innovation, enable reproducible research, and demonstrate how CGRAs can anchor the next wave of agile hardware development. We will conclude with a call for a unified abstraction layer for CGRAs and spatial accelerators, one that decouples hardware specialization from software development. Such a representation would unlock architectural portability, compiler innovation, and a scalable, open foundation for spatial computing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".