Degrees of uncertainty: conformal deep learning for non-invasive core body temperature prediction in extreme environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate estimation of core body temperature (CBT) is essential for physiological monitoring, yet current non-invasive methods lack statistically calibrated uncertainty estimates required for safety-critical use. Here we introduce a conformal deep learning framework for real-time, non-invasive CBT prediction with calibrated uncertainty, demonstrated in high-risk heat-stress environments. Developed from over 140,000 physiological measurements across six operational domains, the model achieves a test error of 0.29 °C, outperforming the widely used ECTemp™ algorithm with a 12-fold improvement in calibrated probabilistic accuracy and statistically valid prediction intervals. Designed for integration with wearable devices, the system uses accessible physiological, demographic, and environmental inputs to support practical, confidence-informed monitoring. A customizable alert engine enables proactive safety interventions based on user-defined thresholds and model confidence. By combining deep learning with conformal prediction, this approach establishes a generalizable foundation for trustworthy, non-invasive physiological monitoring, demonstrated here for CBT under heat stress but applicable to broader safety-critical settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it