Advancing genotype-phenotype analysis through 3D facial morphometry: insights from Cri-du-Chat syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Facial dysmorphism is a feature of many monogenic disorders and is important in diagnostics, variant interpretation and nosology. Nevertheless, comprehensively assessing the complex facial shape changes associated with specific syndromes remains challenging. Here, we present three-dimensional (3D) morphometric approaches to overcome these limitations, using Cri-du-Chat syndrome (CdCS) as a model. METHODS: We analysed 3D facial images from 24 participants with CdCS, 4540 unaffected controls and five participants with rare 5p15.33-15.32 deletions, incorporating two methods to account for age- and sex-related facial variation. We quantified phenotypic variation within and between groups and explored genotype-phenotype correlations in CdCS. RESULTS: We identified changes in the characteristic facial features of CdCS with age and found that facial shape in CdCS differed from controls in highly consistent directions, but with varying magnitudes of effect. 5p15.33-15.32 heterozygotes had non-specific dysmorphic features that were objectively different from those in CdCS, delineating multiple critical regions for facial dysmorphism on chromosome 5p. CONCLUSION: This work explores 3D facial morphometry to complement the standard clinical assessment of facial dysmorphism. It provides insights into the genetic basis of facial shape in CdCS and highlights the potential of 3D morphometric techniques to facilitate clinical diagnostics, variant interpretation and delineation of syndrome nosology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".