High average-flux laser-driven neutron source
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laser-driven neutron generation is an attractive alternative to more established methods for compact, short-pulse-duration neutron sources with applications in medical science, material science and imaging. Despite extensive investigation of various techniques, achieving performance comparable to nuclear reactors or conventional accelerators remains challenging. In this work, we generate a stable, high-repetition-rate laser-driven neutron source reaching a record average flux of 7.8 × 107 n/sr/s, improving on other existing laser-based sources by more than one order of magnitude. Our approach is based on a two-step process where electrons are accelerated to relativistic energies via laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA), and subsequently generate neutrons through Bremsstrahlung emission followed by photonuclear reactions in a tungsten converter. Experimental results, supported by Monte Carlo simulations, show a neutron flux of 3.0 × 107 n/cm2/s near the target, on par with some compact accelerator-based neutron sources. Additionally, a direct comparison with the target-normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) pitcher-catcher scheme, performed on the same laser system, reveals a significantly higher total neutron yield of 3.9 × 108 neutrons per shot, outperforming the TNSA scheme by several orders of magnitude. These findings represent a significant advancement towards the development of practical laser-driven neutron sources and highlight the advantages of LWFA-based neutron generation for future applications. Current short-pulse-duration neutron sources suffer from a low repetition rate, hindering applications. Here, the authors demonstrate advancements of laser-wakefield based photoneutron generation at high repetition rates and conversion efficiencies, providing an alternative to traditional pitcher-catcher methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".