MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416440523 · doi:10.63564/jnep.v15n12p8

Post-licensure nurse training in U.S. health systems: Survey insights into modalities, effectiveness, and perceived gaps

2025· article· W4416440523 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samantha Bastow, Patrick Farrer, Krystal DeVaughn, Kalvin Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBD
KeywordsRespondentModalitiesTraining (meteorology)PerceptionNurse educationHealth careMEDLINECompetence (human resources)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: As the practice of nursing requires broad clinical skills, it demands a wide range of understanding across many disciplines. To address nurse training and competency needs, health systems have implemented varying methods of skill development, including advanced technologies and virtual immersion strategies, in addition to the continuation of more conventional methods. The current literature remains limited in substantiating the effectiveness of a particular method. The objective of the study was to provide insights into the current post-licensure nurse training practice within U.S. health systems, nurse perceptions of training effectiveness for the given methods, and perceived gaps in nurse education. Methods: Design: A research survey of registered nurses across the United States. The survey was developed from published studies that describe the current training modalities deployed across U.S. health systems for nurses and based on direct feedback from practicing nurses. The survey was divided into the following sections: respondent demographics, commonly deployed training strategies, perceived effectiveness of different training methods, and perceived gaps in clinical practice training and competence. Results: A total of 247 nurse survey responses were included in the analysis. The results suggest that there is a disconnect between commonly deployed post-licensure nurse training strategies and the strategies that are perceived to be most valuable. There were several perceived gaps in core clinical nursing skills, highlighting an opportunity to improve upon current training strategies. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the current state of post-licensure nurse training and signals on where health systems may benefit from reassessing their educational strategies and where industry organizations may provide additional support by developing effective multi-modal education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice→Same topicNursing education and management→French-language works237,207→