MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416441538 · doi:10.5306/wjco.v16.i11.110792

Clinicopathological predictors of right para esophageal lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4416441538 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymph node metastasisThyroiditisThyroidMetastasisLymph nodeLymphHashimoto Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Dissection of the right paraesophageal lymph node (RPELN) in managing papillary thyroid carcinoma remains a contentious issue. This meta-analysis assesses previously established and novel risk factors associated with RPELN metastasis. AIM To evaluate previously established and novel risk factors associated with RPELN metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma papillary thyroid carcinoma through a comprehensive meta-analysis. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), ScienceDirect, Scopus and EMBASE up to December 2024. Studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analysis was conducted with RevMan version 5.4, using the Q -test and I 2-test for heterogeneity. Sensitivity was evaluated with the leave-one-out method, and publication bias with the Egger regression test and funnel plot. RESULTS Of 2444 articles retrieved, 26 were included in our meta-analysis with 16427 patients. The RPELN metastasis rate was 12.98% [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.46%-13.50%]. The pooled results suggested that age < 55 years [odds ratio (OR) = 1.71, 95%CI: 1.35-2.16, P < 0.00001], sex (OR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.54-0.67, P < 0.00001), tumor size 1 cm (OR = 3.37, 95%CI: 2.69-4.21, P < 0.00001), multifocality (OR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.49-2.20, P < 0.00001), capsular invasion (OR = 2.94, 95%CI: 2.05-4.20, P < 0.00001), vascular invasion (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.56-2.99, P < 0.00001), extra-thyroid extension (OR = 3.30, 95%CI: 1.82-5.98, P < 0.0001), central lymph node metastasis (OR = 7.77, 95%CI: 4.73-12.76, P < 0.00001), lateral lymph node metastasis (OR = 6.94, 95%CI: 6.11-7.89, P < 0.00001), Hashimoto thyroiditis (OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.92, P = 0.002), micro-calcifications (OR = 2.29, 95%CI: 1.20-4.37, P = 0.01), and echogenicity (OR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.40-0.98, P = 0.04) should be considered with RPELN metastasis. CONCLUSION The male < 55, tumor size > 1 cm, multifocality, capsular and vascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and Hashimoto thyroiditis were significantly associated with RPELN metastasis and should be carefully assessed during dissection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0450.013
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it