Phylogenomic Insights into the Origin and Dispersal of Domesticated Chickens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The origin, domestication process and genetic diversity of domesticated chickens have always been important contents in the study of animal genetics and the evolution of poultry. Based on the latest achievements in phylogenetic genomics in recent years, this study sorted out the multiple independent domestication processes of domesticated chickens, the gene exchange between wild junglefowl and domesticated chickens, and the paths by which they spread from their native habitats to the world, and explored the genetic reasons for domesticated chickens to adapt to different environments and form local breeds. This study also analyzed the relationship between the geographical distribution of domesticated chickens and human migration, and expounded some representative diffusion cases in the Pacific and African regions. This study aims to provide a theoretical basis for understanding the evolutionary history and genetic structure of domesticated chickens, and also to offer a scientific basis for the protection of local chicken breeds and future breeding strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it