MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416443135 · doi:10.5376/gab.2025.16.0001

Research Insights into the Genetic Regulation of Root Architecture in Sweet Potato

2025· article· W4416443135 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu Chen, Lin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueGenomics and Applied Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneTranscription factorTranscriptional regulationAuxinRegulation of gene expressionTranscription (linguistics)Fight-or-flight response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study offers an in-depth analysis of the genetic regulation of root architecture in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), focusing on key transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms that govern storage root development. Through dynamic network biomarker analysis, transcription factors such as IbNAC083 and IbMYB73 were identified as critical regulators of root initiation and stress response. In addition, the study highlights developmentally regulated genes involved in root thickening, including the receptor-like kinase SRF6, as well as key pathways like anthocyanin biosynthesis mediated by IbMYB1-2 and tuberous root initiation controlled by IbMADS1. RNA-Seq and iTRAQ analyses revealed several vital pathways, such as starch biosynthesis and auxin response factor-mediated differentiation between storage and normal roots. This research provides a valuable foundation for future biotechnological approaches to enhance sweet potato yield and resilience, thereby advancing sustainable cultivation practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomics and Applied BiologySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207