MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416443307 · doi:10.5376/be.2025.15.0017

Salt Tolerance Domestication in Pitaya: Genetic Regulation of Ion Homeostasis, Osmoregulation, and Root System Architecture

2025· article· W4416443307 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhonggang Li, Yeping Han

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Evidence · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptabilityDomesticationGeneMechanism (biology)TranscriptomeRoot systemSalt (chemistry)Regulator geneYield (engineering)Adaptation (eye)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pitaya, due to its heat, drought and poor soil tolerance, is widely cultivated in saline-alkali lands in Southeast Asia, the Middle East and other regions. But, salt stress remains an important factor affecting its yield and growth. To enhance its adaptability in saline-alkali environments, this study has sorted out the genetic regulatory mechanism of pitayat's salt tolerance, focusing on three major aspects: ion balance, osmotic regulation and root structure. Several key genes, like HuTZF3 , HuERF1 and HuBADH , have been identified in the research, which play significant roles in regulating ion transport, antioxidant response and root development. Based on transcriptome and functional verification data, a regulatory network of these genes has been initially established. The study also summarized several current strategies for salt-tolerant breeding, including field screening, MAS, GS and gene editing. The results show that, if the salt tolerance potential of wild resources is combined with precise molecular tools, it is expected to accelerate the breeding process of new salt-tolerant varieties. This study provides ideas and technical paths for the in-depth research, and breeding application of pitaya's salt tolerance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological EvidenceSame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207