MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416443596 · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102961

Improving estuarine discharge forecasting with a KAN-augmented LSTM model: A case study of the Yangtze River Estuary

2025· article· en· W4416443596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology Regional Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsEstuaryYangtze riverArtificial neural networkAdaptabilityLimitingNonlinear systemStreamflowDeep learningStream flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xuliujing section, Yangtze River Estuary, China. Predicting discharge in tidal rivers is challenging due to complex flow dynamics influenced by topography, tides, runoff, and weather. Traditional forecasting methods struggle with fixed parameters, limiting their adaptability and accuracy over time. To address this, we propose an enhanced deep learning model, A KAN-augmented LSTM framework, which integrates a Kolmogorov-Arnold network (KAN) with a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. This model retains LSTM's ability to handle long-term dependencies while replacing the fully connected layer with a KAN layer. A learnable B-spline activation function in the KAN layer improves the model's capacity to capture nonlinear dynamics and long-term dependencies in time series data, enhancing forecasting accuracy. This paper applies the LSTM-KAN model to the Xuliujing section of the Yangtze River Estuary and compares its performance with traditional harmonic analysis (HA) and four neural network models: LSTM, XGBoost, DLinear, and Informer. The results demonstrate that the LSTM-KAN model significantly enhances discharge forecasting accuracy, outperforming all comparative methods across short-term (6 h), medium-term (12–24 h), and long-term (36–48 h) forecasts. Specifically, it achieved relative accuracy improvements of 12.1 %–35.2 % over HA and 7 %–52.8 % over the traditional LSTM model. These findings suggest that the complex interplay of tidal forcing, runoff, and weather in the Yangtze Estuary is better represented by the adaptive, function-learning paradigm of KAN than by models with fixed nonlinearities. The model's superior performance offers new insights for studying complex flow dynamics, indicating that deep learning techniques with learnable activation functions provide a more powerful and accurate tool for operational forecasting in highly dynamic tidal river environments. • This study developed an LSTM-KAN model for more accurate discharge forecasting in tidal rivers. • KAN leverages adaptive edge-weight activation to capture tidal-hydrodynamic nonlinearities with fewer parameters. • This study first embeds the architecture in hydrologic forecasting, using the Yangtze Xuliujing reach as the pilot. • The proposed model significantly outperforms traditional approaches in streamflow-forecasting accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it