Widespread loss of Y expression in the absence of transcriptional dosage compensation in <i>Rumex hastatulus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is growing interest in the potential role of gene regulatory evolution in the expansion and degeneration of Y chromosomes. Evolutionarily young sex chromosomes, such as those found in the flowering plant Rumex hastatulus, can provide insights into the early stages of this process. Using a new high-quality genome assembly with a well-assembled Y chromosome and a highly replicated transcriptome dataset, we found widespread underexpression of Y genes compared to their homologous counterparts on the X chromosome. We also found evidence for increased expression differences for more distantly diverged gametologs, suggestive of progressive loss of expression of Y linked genes over time. Genes with greater expression loss on the Y chromosome also showed elevated rates of protein evolution, as expected if silencing alleles mask the effects of deleterious mutations on the Y and/or if selective interference drives early degeneration in regulatory sequences. However, in contrast with the predictions of recent models of sex chromosome expansion and degeneration by regulatory evolution, there was no evidence of early dosage compensation. Overall, we conclude that in Rumex Hill-Robertson interference alone may be the main driver of Y chromosome degeneration, although further understanding of the temporal order of regulatory changes could help further untangle cause and effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".