MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Gut Microbiota – Overview of the Gut–Brain Axis and Its Association with Protein Misfolding in Parkinson’s Disease

2025· article· W4416445097 on OpenAlexaff
Junxi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical and Natural Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseGut floraInflammationImmune systemGut–brain axisFunction (biology)ImmunityDopaminergicBalance (ability)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a long-term neurodegenerative disorder best known for its motor symptoms, though many patients also experience non-motor issues. A key feature of PD is the abnormal folding and buildup of α-synuclein, which disrupts normal neuron function and contributes to the loss of dopaminergic cells. In recent years, researchers have started to look beyond the brain and found that the gut might play a major part in the disease process. The gut–brain axis, a communication system linking the nervous, immune, and metabolic systems, appears to connect gut health with PD pathology. The gut microbiota help maintain immune balance and barrier function, but when this balance is disturbed, inflammation and oxidative stress can promote α-synuclein aggregation. This review brings together recent evidence on how the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability, and inflammation may interact with α-synuclein misfolding. It also looks at possible therapeutic approaches, including diet, probiotics, and microbiota-based treatments, while pointing out the limits of current studies and the need for more causal research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheoretical and Natural Science→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→