MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416445437 · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2025.10.012

Co-producing knowledge with Indigenous Peoples: challenges and solutions for academic institutions

2025· article· en· W4416445437 on OpenAlexafffund
Jaime Grimm, Madeline Jarvis‐Cross, Megan Bailey, Natalie C. Ban, M. Claire Bartlett, Rachael Cadman, Sara E. Cannon, Steven J. Cooke, Kristen Cyr, Véronique Dubos, Alexander T. Duncan, Joseph Gazing Wolf, Hannah L. Harrison, Andrea E. Kirkwood, R. L. Meng, Nasya Moore, Markelle E Morphet, Nigel C. Sainsbury, Christina A. D. Semeniuk, Lena Sherwood, Niiyokamigaabaw Deondre Smiles, Erin D. Smith, Brian Timmer, Carrie Anne Vanderhoop, Kyle L. Wilson, Andrew W. Bateman, Martin Krkošek

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Ecology & Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsDassault Systèmes (Canada)Simon Fraser UniversityMcMaster UniversityFields Institute for Research in Mathematical SciencesUniversité LavalUniversity of WindsorUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityCarleton UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaFisheries and Oceans CanadaOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsIndigenousTraditional knowledgeWork (physics)Knowledge-based systems

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0310.032
Scholarly communication0.0350.030
Open science0.0070.060
Research integrity0.0110.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTrends in Ecology & EvolutionSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207