MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416448242 · doi:10.1093/jimmun/vkaf283.1953

Do type III interferons play a role in bronchopulmonary dysplasia? 4248

2025· article· en· W4416448242 on OpenAlexaff
Katryna Boudreau, Mélissande Osouf, Geneviève Pépin, Erwan Pernet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperoxiaOxidative stressInflammationBronchopulmonary dysplasiaLungIn vivoDownregulation and upregulationReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Description Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) is the most common complication associated with prematurity. It is characterized by an arrest of lung development due to inflammatory responses induced by oxidative stress caused primarily by mechanical ventilation and oxygen supplementation. However, the mechanisms linking oxidative stress and pulmonary inflammation remain poorly understood. Recent studies have shown that type I and III interferons (IFN-I and IFN-III) disrupt lung epithelial barrier and repair process during viral infection. However, the role of IFN-III in BPD is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to assess the effects of hyperoxia on IFN-I/III production and its effects on alveolar epithelial cell (AECs) functions. For this, we used in vivo (mouse) and in vitro (AECs cell line) models of hyperoxia (>95% O2) compared to normoxia (21% O2). We found that while hyperoxia had no effects on IFN-I levels, we observed a significant increase in IFN-III production by AECs. We also found that hyperoxia reduced AECs proliferation even after return to normoxia, a feature of cellular senescence. We envision that blocking IFN-III or its receptor will reverse this phenotype. Thus, our results provide new insights into a potential novel therapeutic target for BPD. Topic Categories Immune Response Regulation: Cellular Mechanisms (IRC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→