MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416450153 · doi:10.1186/s12883-025-04464-2

Development and validation of a nomogram for identifying cognitive impairment in patients with leukoaraiosis

2025· article· en· W4416450153 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guoxin Zhang, Lijun Meng, Mingyang Xu, Yi Lu, Liping Yin, Jianning Li, Wenwen Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomogramLeukoaraiosisCognitive impairmentLogistic regressionNeurologyNeurosurgeryCognitionNeurochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Leukoaraiosis (LA) is a common cerebral small vessel disease in elderly populations that frequently leads to cognitive impairment and may progress to vascular dementia. Early identification of cognitive dysfunction remains challenging due to the subtle onset and lack of specific biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To identify key factors associated with cognitive impairment in LA patients and develop a logistic regression-based identification model to facilitate early clinical recognition and intervention. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 390 LA patients admitted to the Department of Neurology between June 2020 and April 2023. Patients were classified into cognitive impairment (CI) and non-cognitive impairment (NCI) groups based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Data collected included demographics, medical history, biochemical markers, and neuroimaging features. The dataset was randomly split 7:3 into training (n = 273) and validation (n = 117) sets. Univariate analysis identified significant variables (p < 0.05), which were then incorporated into multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed based on the final model, and performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots for both training and validation sets. RESULTS: In the training set of 273 patients, 137 had cognitive impairment and 136 did not. Univariate analysis revealed that age, Fazekas score, intracranial arterial stenosis assessment (IASA), serum creatinine, and total bilirubin were significantly associated with cognitive impairment (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified age (OR = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.11-1.24), IASA (OR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.64-3.68), and Fazekas score (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 1.74-3.60) as independently associated factors. The logistic regression model demonstrated excellent discrimination with AUC values of 0.873 and 0.814 for training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, confirming model reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Age, intracranial arterial stenosis assessment, and Fazekas score are independently associated with cognitive impairment in LA patients. The logistic regression model with nomogram provides a clinically practical tool for identifying and stratifying patients with cognitive impairment, facilitating targeted clinical assessment and intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeurologySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207