MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416452053 · doi:10.1177/15209156251390818

Clinical Trials in Diabetes: Examining the Value of Use of Continuous Dual Glucose-Ketone Monitoring

2025· article· en· W4416452053 on OpenAlexaff
Halis Kaan Aktürk, Bruce A. Perkins, Timothy C. Dunn

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsSinai Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetic ketoacidosisContinuous glucose monitoringType 1 diabetesClinical trialDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesIncidence (geometry)Insulin delivery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a critical medical condition that often necessitates emergency treatment and hospitalization. Although DKA primarily impacts individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D), its annual incidence among adults with T1D ranges from 4% to 8% following diagnosis. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become a standard tool for managing T1D and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in patients using insulin or aiming to improve self-management. However, advances in continuous dual glucose-ketone monitoring (DGK) technology offer new possibilities for clinical research and patient care. This article explores the potential applications of DGK in clinical research, with a focus on T1D, while also considering its broader relevance for T2D and other patient populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.145
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.374
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1450.374
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Technology & TherapeuticsSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207