MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416452087 · doi:10.47852/bonviewfsi52027409

Optimizing Impact Investment Portfolios with Reinforcement Learning: A Data-Driven Framework for Balancing Financial Returns and SDG Alignment

2025· article· W4416452087 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjay Agal, Krishna Raulji, Kishori Shekokar, Nikunj Bhavsar

Bibliographic record

VenueFinTech and Sustainable Innovation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningSharpe ratioSustainabilityDrawdown (hydrology)PortfolioInvestment strategyPortfolio optimizationMarkov decision processInvestment (military)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impact investors face a complex multi-objective optimization challenge: balancing financial returns with sustainability outcomes, particularly alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Traditional portfolio optimization methods fall short in dynamically integrating real-time sustainability metrics and adapting to changing market conditions. This paper introduces a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework designed to optimize impact investment portfolios by simultaneously maximizing risk-adjusted financial returns and SDG alignment. We formulate the portfolio management task as a Markov decision process, incorporating both financial indicators and sustainability metrics into the state space, and propose a dual-objective reward function that allows investors to specify their preferred trade-off between financial and impact goals. Using a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient algorithm, our RL agent learns optimal allocation strategies through interaction with a simulated market environment. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms traditional methods, achieving an 80.8% higher Sharpe ratio (1.32 vs. 0.73 for mean-variance optimization (MVO)), 87.1% SDG alignment, and a 34.2% reduction in maximum drawdown (–12.3% vs. –18.7% for MVO). The framework also maintains an average environmental, social, and governance score of 82.4 and reduces carbon intensity by 27.6%. The study contributes a scalable, data-driven approach to sustainable finance, enabling more responsive and responsible investment strategies without compromising financial performance. Received: 27 August 2025 | Revised: 10 October 2025 | Accepted: 3 November 2025 Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement The data that support this work are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Author Contribution Statement Sanjay Agal: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Krishna Raulji: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Kishori Shekokar: Writing – review & editing. Nikunj Bhavsar: Software, Validation, Resources, Data curation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFinTech and Sustainable InnovationSame topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207