Imprimer, lire et primer la littérature autochtone québécoise en France : essor et enjeux d’une diffusion internationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La littérature autochtone produite au Québec se retrouve à différents niveaux du panorama littéraire français : à l’occasion de festivals consacrés à la littérature d’Amérique du Nord ou du monde entier, à travers différents prix littéraires ou, encore, à travers des collections éditoriales lui étant dédiées (« Voix autochtones », aux éditions du Seuil, lancée en 2023, « Talismans », aux éditions Dépaysage, lancée en 2019). Qu’en est-il du travail de ces acteurs français du livre ? Quel paysage littéraire autochtone québécois peut-il se construire dans le contexte littéraire mondial ? Cet article documente tant le travail de ces acteurs que le regard qu’ils portent sur les ouvrages de littérature autochtone publiés en France, et suit ainsi leur parcours international conditionné par une fabrique du livre établie en dehors de son espace de production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".