MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416478222 · doi:10.1145/3680207.3765592

Demo: Split-and-Pipeline: Collaborative Large Model Inference on Edge Devices

2025· article· W4416478222 on OpenAlexaff
Zuguang Li, Dongyuan Ou, Wen Wu, S. H. Zhang, Shaohua Wu, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestbedInferenceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionScheme (mathematics)Edge deviceThroughputData transmissionEdge computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deploying and executing large model inference on edge devices is challenging due to their limited computational power and memory resources. To address this challenge, we present a novel Split-and-Pipeline, a collaborative inference scheme that partitions a large model into multiple submodels and executes them across distributed edge devices in a pipelined manner. The scheme parallelizes data transfer across multiple CPU cores to avoid transmission bottlenecks. We build a real-world testbed using NVIDIA Jetson series edge devices to demonstrate the proposed scheme, achieving 1.2×–3.0× throughput improvement over state-of-the-art baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207