MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416501458 · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-09162-5

Internet of Things-based pulsed electromagnetic field combined with exercise therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial protocol

2025· article· en· W4416501458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technologies and Applied Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsProtocol (science)Clinical trialThe InternetResearch ethicsEthics committeeResearch designProtocol designAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic musculoskeletal condition that affects the entire joint structure. Although pulsed magnetic therapy is widely recommended to alleviate KOA symptoms and telerehabilitation is increasingly utilized for its management, there is a lack of research comparing Internet of Things-based pulsed electromagnetic field combined with exercise (IOT-BPEMFE) methods to traditional outpatient therapy (OT). This study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of IOT-BPEMFE on pain reduction, functional recovery, quality of life, and participant adherence in a community setting, relative to outpatient therapy. METHODS: This study adopts a single-blind randomized controlled design. One-hundred and twelve patients with KOA (≥ 40 years) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the IOT-BPEMFE or the OT groups. The intervention will last for 4 weeks. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline (T0) and at 2 weeks (T1), 4 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks (T3) after the randomization. The primary outcome will be measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes will include the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), 36-Item Short Form health Survey (SF-36), Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Timed "Up and Go" test (TUG), manual muscle test (MMT), range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), patient satisfaction with the treatment, and any adverse events. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study will help establish the feasibility and effectiveness of IOT-BPEMFE for patients with KOA in the community. By highlighting this study's methodological strengths and limitations, the results may guide the implementation and optimization of IOT-BPEMFE in community-based KOA telerehabilitation. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: This study will be the first to demonstrate that combining electromagnetic field therapy with exercise via the Internet of Things (IoT) can effectively reduce pain, improve physical function, and enhance quality of life in community-dwelling patients with knee osteoarthritis. We will use self-report tools for measurement, which may lead to social desirability bias. Additionally, due to time and budget constraints, the study will not include follow-up beyond the 12-week post-randomization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR 2300071181; Registration time: May 6, 2023) and approved by the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research of the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it