MENTORAT ET PRATIQUES EN CLASSE : PERCEPTIONS DE STAGIAIRES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cette recherche, réalisée durant le dernier stage du baccalauréat en enseignement secondaire dans une université québécoise, analyse les perceptions de six stagiaires sur les pratiques d’accompagnement de leur enseignant associé et décrit leurs pratiques en classe. En utilisant la théorie de l’autodétermination, les perceptions ont été examinées via des entretiens semi-dirigés. Les résultats suggèrent que les stagiaires perçoivent généralement un soutien adéquat de la part de leurs mentors en ce qui concerne le besoin d’appartenance. En revanche, le soutien perçu à l’égard de l’autonomie apparaît plus variable, tandis que celui lié au besoin de compétence semble plus limité. Les stagiaires évoquent également des difficultés à déployer des pratiques de soutien aux élèves. L’étude recommande d’adapter le soutien aux stagiaires et de renforcer la formation pratique pour mieux répondre aux besoins des élèves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".