The influence of social change on informal care among older spouses in rural Ghana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Informal care is essential for older people living in low- and middle-income countries, where there is less public funding aimed at promoting well-being in later life. In Ghana, however, the emergence of economic modernization has led to the decline of informal care from adult children, resulting in increasing reliance on spousal care. Despite this shift, gaps remain in our understanding of older spouses' care for one another in rural Ghana, such as the influence of individualism, patriarchy, and the caregiver's own mental and physical health. This study sought to address these gaps by exploring the ways that economic modernization has changed older spouses' experiences of caregiving. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 married couples from three rural towns in Ghana. RESULTS: Spouses perceived economic modernization as influencing a shift in their children's values from interdependent to independent, which motivated their children's migration to urban areas in pursuit of their individual socioeconomic advancement. This contrasts with children's traditional obligations rooted in collectivism, including providing informal care for their aging parents. The relative absence of adult children in rural Ghana thus compels an increasing reliance on spousal care, leading to challenges including exhaustion, gender incongruence with the traditional caregiving role, depression, and loneliness. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Declining filial care in low- and middle-income countries highlights the need for government policies that ease older spouses' care burdens, such as implementing non-contributory pension schemes, expanding community-based formal care, and developing rural infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".